[48954] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tatsuya Kawasaki)
Thu Jun 20 09:06:56 2002
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:03:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Tatsuya Kawasaki <tatsuya@kivex.com>
To: "Mitchell, Dan" <Dan.Mitchell@hosting.com>
Cc: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <593552EB08E7D411902F0002A52C7BBED1323B@hnmdexc01.hosting.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Dan,
it depend...
if you turned off snmp on host, then you should be able to monitor not
neceessary control.. for unix box, I am sure there is way to control as
well.
if you are using cisco, then there is a command called traffic-shape will
allow to restrict outbound traffic to the host .. :-)
Tatsuya
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
Tatsuya Kawasaki
Allegiance Internet
Phone 800.581.8711 Fax 240.616.2414
Affiliation given for identification not representation
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:48:34 -0400
> From: "Mitchell, Dan" <Dan.Mitchell@hosting.com>
> To: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
> Subject: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Does anyone know of a low-cost solution for monitoring bandwidth by IP? My
> original thought was 1 switch port = 1 IP, but in the case of virtual IP's
> on a single port, that just wouldn't work. I'm seeing more and more of a
> demand for a basic BW report by IP, so our customers can bill their customer
> accordingly.
>
> Any recommendations?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> Dan Mitchell
> Internet Systems Engineer - Boston
> AllegianceInternet / Hosting.com
> 781.478.1857 Direct Line
> dan.mitchell@hosting.com
>
