[48943] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SPEWS?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lionel)
Wed Jun 19 23:47:39 2002
From: Lionel <longword@newsguy.com>
To: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 13:47:27 +1000
Reply-To: longword@newsguy.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0206192312590.2260-100000@NEON.hq.nac.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
[emailed to Alex & the list]
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:14:28 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time), Alex
Rubenstein <alex@nac.net> wrote:
>Since my last posting, I've told SpamAssassin (which, btw, is a rocking
>piece of ware) to count osirussoft (sp?) as a 0 point rule.
>
>They are so unilateral in the way they do this, and, often times don't
>even provide a _chance_ for the ISP to rectify the situation.
>
>It's crazy.
I know I'm going to regret commenting, but hopefully it'll help.
How long had you been getting complaints about your user before you were
SPEWS listed?
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
