[48937] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: SPEWS?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Wed Jun 19 23:16:55 2002
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 23:14:28 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: Mark Radabaugh <mark@amplex.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <MOEMIEFAGIMHBFOCOJKHAELJGKAA.mark@amplex.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Quite.
Since my last posting, I've told SpamAssassin (which, btw, is a rocking
piece of ware) to count osirussoft (sp?) as a 0 point rule.
They are so unilateral in the way they do this, and, often times don't
even provide a _chance_ for the ISP to rectify the situation.
It's crazy.
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
>
>
> >
> > So, to the point; what is the consensus on SPEWs? I've never really
> > noticed them until this point.
> >
>
> It's sort of an interesting concept but at least in my opinion it is
> unusable as a blacklist. Did you find the listing was causing a lot of
> mail to bounce?
>
> Mark Radabaugh
> Amplex
> (419) 833-3635
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
-- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
