[48716] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: What's wrong with provisioning tools?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniska Tomas)
Thu Jun 13 10:38:44 2002
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:37:06 +0200
From: "Daniska Tomas" <tomas@tronet.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
bob,
i was more interested in something emulating a vt100 that one could =
eventually plug to a console port and chat with the box...
from someone's post sooner in this thread it seemed that someone is =
using it out there...
i like the idea of "talking" with the box while let's say driving a =
car...=20
e.g. vocollect does something close to this but it's more an in-building =
solution than an over-the-phone stuff
http://www.vocollect.com/sitehtml/products/talkman01.php
maybe it would be worth making some mediation to pstn and a proxy app =
which could ssh the boxes :)
--
=20
Tomas Daniska
systems engineer
Tronet Computer Networks
Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia
tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199
=20
A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by =
blowing first.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Bradlee [mailto:Bob@BRADLEE.ORG]=20
> Sent: 13. j=FAna 2002 16:29
> To: Daniska Tomas
> Subject: RE: What's wrong with provisioning tools?
>=20
>=20
> I have a client HTTP://www.CORRS.ORG using several=20
> speech-synthesis terminals,
> they even have a brail printer on the network.
> I donate my eyes to them from time to time, but they get=20
> along very well on their own.
>=20
> Bob
>=20
>=20
> --Original Message Text---
> From: Daniska Tomas
> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:15:23 +0200
>=20
> Message by the way - those speech-synthesis terminals were a=20
> just joke or is anyone really using them? :))
> =20
