[48599] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Inconsistent routes, was Re: mail-abuse.org down?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Sun Jun 9 16:54:34 2002
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 21:53:54 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk>
To: Rob Thomas <robt@cymru.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <ROTMAILER.0206091524130.12981-100000@dragon.sauron.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I'm seeing about 150 such routes - I'm not collecting routing tables hence
my lower number. But, these routes on the whole dont match up with the
ones you've just posted Rob.. (being in the UK I guess I see a very
different view of the routing table..?)
I dont keep track of inconsistent announcements as I've never really seen
many in the past altho maybe I should start graphing!
Anyhow, I looked into a few and they all seem unrelated - some have both
sets of routes registered some dont, theres no correlation of transit AS's
Theres also a large variation in sizes from /14 to /24 so it appears not
just to be just small providers..
Steve
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Rob Thomas wrote:
>
> Hi, all.
>
> Aside from the restaurants, how's Toronto? :)
>
> ] http://www.cymru.com/BGP/incon01.html
>
> The list can be found here:
>
> http://www.cymru.com/BGP/incon01-list.txt
>
> This is the output of a very beta script. Comments welcome!
>
> Thanks,
> Rob.
>
