[48502] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sabri Berisha)
Thu Jun 6 10:24:18 2002
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:23:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Sabri Berisha <sabri@cluecentral.net>
To: Daniska Tomas <tomas@tronet.com>
Cc: "Nipper, Arnold" <arnold.nipper@de-cix.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <A44DA7EDD8262343B02C64AF7E063A0726E3D5@kenya.ba.tronet.sk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Daniska Tomas wrote:
Hi,
> how would you guarantee connectivity?
>
> should each isp present should provide bandwidth as part of collocation expenses?
> should the opexes be included in the colo bill?
>
> and then - this would probably make the colo becoming a connectivity
> provider, wouldn't it?
I think Arnold has a point. The internet-community as a whole has benefits
in more secondaries and I for myself would not mind paying a tiny bit of
the costs in my IX-connection-fee's. I can image more parties share this
feeling.
--
Sabri Berisha
'Een beter internet begint bij jezelf.'
