[48500] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniska Tomas)
Thu Jun 6 10:14:51 2002

Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:13:08 +0200
From: "Daniska Tomas" <tomas@tronet.com>
To: "Nipper, Arnold" <arnold.nipper@de-cix.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


how would you guarantee connectivity?

should each isp present should provide bandwidth as part of collocation =
expenses?
should the opexes be included in the colo bill?

and then - this would probably make the colo becoming a connectivity =
provider, wouldn't it?

--
=20
Tomas Daniska
systems engineer
Tronet Computer Networks
Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia
tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199
=20
A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by =
blowing first.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nipper, Arnold [mailto:arnold.nipper@de-cix.net]=20
> Sent: 6. j=FAna 2002 16:07
> To: Jan-Ahrent Czmok; Sabine Dolderer/Denic
> Cc: apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net; apops@lists.apnic.net;=20
> ddiaz@ripe.net; joao@ripe.net; lir-wg@ripe.net;=20
> nanog@merit.edu; randy@psg.com; routing-wg@ripe.net; tech-l@ams-ix.net
> Subject: Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> As a lot of people are offering secondary services: may be=20
> it's a good idea
> to place infrastructural services at IXP. IXP seem to be more=20
> stable than
> any ISPs and often more neutral than ISPs.
>=20
> Comments?
>=20
>=20
> Arnold
> --
> Arnold Nipper, DE-CIX, the German Internet Exchange
> email: arnold.nipper@de-cix.net
> mobile: +49 172 2650958
> handle: an6695-ripe
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sabine Dolderer/Denic" <dolderer@denic.de>
> To: "Jan-Ahrent Czmok" <czmok@gatel.net>
> Cc: <apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net>; <apops@lists.apnic.net>;=20
> <ddiaz@ripe.net>;
> <joao@ripe.net>; <lir-wg@ripe.net>; <nanog@merit.edu>;=20
> <randy@psg.com>;
> <routing-wg@ripe.net>; <tech-l@ams-ix.net>
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 9:43 AM
> Subject: Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Hello,
>=20
> DENIC runs currently several secondarys (not only DE but also for some
> other TLDs) in different places worldwide. We are willing to offer
> secondary service for other ccTLDs. But there will be because of
> security/stability reasons a limit on the number of ccTLDs we=20
> want to run
> on a single machine.
>=20
> Sabine
>=20
> --
> Sabine  Dolderer
> DENIC eG
> Wiesenh=FCttenplatz 26
> D-60329 Frankfurt
>=20
> eMail: Sabine.Dolderer@denic.de
> Fon: +49 69 27235 0
> Fax: +49 69 27235 235
>=20
>=20
>=20
>                     Jan-Ahrent
>                     Czmok                An:     Joao Luis Silva Damas
> <joao@ripe.net>
>                     <czmok@gatel.        Kopie:  randy@psg.com,
> ddiaz@ripe.net, routing-wg@ripe.net,
>                     net>                 lir-wg@ripe.net,=20
> tech-l@ams-ix.net,
> apops@lists.apnic.net,
>                     Gesendet von:        nanog@merit.edu,
> apnic-talk@lists.apnic.net
>                     owner-lir-wg@        Thema:  Re: KPNQwest=20
> ns.eu.net
> server.
>                     ripe.net
>=20
>=20
>                     06.06.2002
>                     01:29
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> PostedDate: 06.06.2002 01:29:37
> $MessageID: <20020606012937.2c476312.czmok@gatel.net>
> From: owner-lir-wg@ripe.net
> SendTo: Joao Luis Silva Damas <joao@ripe.net>
> CopyTo:
> randy@psg.com;ddiaz@ripe.net;routing-wg@ripe.net;lir-wg@ripe.n
> et;tech-l@ams-
> ix.net;apops@lists.apnic.net;nanog@merit.edu;apnic-talk@lists.
> apnic.net
>=20
> Subject: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
> Received: from smtp.denic.de ([194.246.96.22])          by=20
> notes.denic.de
> (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.8)          with ESMTP id=20
> 2002060601283597:15602
> ;          Thu, 6 Jun 2002 01:28:35 +0200
> Received: from postman.ripe.net (postman.ripe.net [193.0.0.199])  by
> smtp.denic.de with smtp  id 17FkCg-0004uX-00; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 01:28:34
> +0200
> Received: (qmail 11455 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2002 23:28:15 -0000
> Received: (qmail 11452 invoked by uid 66); 5 Jun 2002 23:28:15 -0000
> Delivered_To: lists-lir-wg-out@lists.ripe.net
> PRINCIPAL: Jan-Ahrent Czmok <czmok@gatel.net>
> In_Reply_To: <p05111700b92449b9ddee@[193.0.1.81]>
> References: <200206051725.g55HPlA05396@birch.ripe.net>
> <E17Ff8f-0003So-00@roam.psg.com>  =20
> <p05111700b92449b9ddee@[193.0.1.81]>
> Organization: Global Access Telecommunications Inc.
> $Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.6claws16 (GTK+ 1.2.10;=20
> i386-debian-linux-gnu)
> X_Ncc_RegID: de.gatel
> MIME_Version: 1.0
> Precedence: bulk
> X_Loop_Detect: RIPE NCC
> SMTPOriginator: owner-lir-wg@ripe.net
> RouteServers: CN=3Dnotes/O=3DDenic
> RouteTimes: 06.06.2002 01:28:36-06.06.2002 01:28:38
> DeliveredDate: 06.06.2002 01:28:38
> DENICDOCOPENCOUNT: 1
> $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on notes/Denic(Release=20
> 5.0.8 |June 18,
> 2001) at 06.06.2002 01:28:36;MIME-CD by Notes Client on Sabine
> Dolderer/Denic(Release 5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 06.06.2002
> 09:32:28;MIME-CD complete at 06.06.2002 09:32:28
> BlindCopyTo:
> WebSubject: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 01:08:46 +0200
> Joao Luis Silva Damas <joao@ripe.net> wrote:
>=20
> >
> > At 11:04 -0700 5/6/02, Randy Bush wrote:
> > >  > Given the current situation of KPNQwest and the possibility
> > >>  of its services going offline sometime soon, the RIPE NCC in
> > >>  agreement with KPNQwest will be temporally hosting this
> > >>  server (ns.eu.net) in its premises.
> > >
> > >nice emergency hack and sorry to whine.  but i used them both
> > >to get diversity.
> >
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > there are 16 ccTLDs for which ns.ripe.net and ns.eu.net are both
> > secondary. So we will definitely request those ccTLDs to look for a
> > new host as soon as possible.
>=20
> Hi Randy, hi Joao, dear routing-wg,
>=20
> probably my Company (GATEL, AS13129) is able to host a secondary
> server for the ccTLDs.
>=20
> The question is rather what are the hardware "requirements" for the
> secondary
> server.
>=20
> We have sufficient bandwidth capacity available and rack=20
> space as well.
>=20
> > The rest can take bit more time to think what they want to do since
> > ns.eu.net will keep running.
>=20
> Well done ! Congrats for the good ideas and coordination work.
>=20
> >
> > We are offering secondary service on ns.ripe.net for any ccTLD that
> > we weren't sencodaring for, as are other people.
> >
> > The idea is not to have ns.eu.net running for ever, just to enable
> > people to have time to take rational decisions, without the fear of
> > having the server going away because of some unexpected turn of
> > events.
> >
> > >
> > >when in less of a panic, please move it to moscow or something.
> >
> > Panic? what panic? this is just common sense
> >
>=20
> right. it's not panic.
>=20
> --jan
>=20
> --
>      Jan Ahrent Czmok - Senior Network Engineer - Access Networks
> Global Access Telecommunications, Inc. - Stephanstr. 3 -=20
> 60313 Frankfurt
> voice: +49 69 299896-35 - fax: +49 69 299896-66 - email:=20
> czmok@gatel.de
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post