[48383] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Trying to find a connectivity provider that wont go under (was RE: CAIS/Ardent and now Network Access Solutions)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu May 30 21:20:47 2002
To: jpalmer@utilinc.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 May 2002 16:24:53 CDT."
<002101c20820$70d9e8e0$8101a8c0@TAKA>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 21:20:22 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-1503638948P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 30 May 2002 16:24:53 CDT, John Palmer <jpalmer@utilinc.com> said:
> way too high, mostly because they have no local POPs. We really need to
> be as close to the top as possible, not because of bandwidth needs, but
> for reliability's sake.
This assumes that "the top" is any more reliable/clued/financially solvent.
Scanning the last year's archives for "chapter 11" and/or "depeering" might
be quite enlightening....
--==_Exmh_-1503638948P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE89s/WcC3lWbTT17ARAr3tAKCHyP/yE9O7xpsn0l18iVu9ZUGZLwCeOD8A
BKEpplMcoqDNnUcBL3ZYEFA=
=//CS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1503638948P--
