[48204] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re[2]: Routers vs. PC's for routing - was list problems?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (E.B. Dreger)
Thu May 23 16:34:07 2002

Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 20:31:23 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
Cc: Vinny Abello <vinny@tellurian.com>,
	David Charlap <David.Charlap@marconi.com>,
	"nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0205231615370.1384-100000@NEON.hq.nac.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0205232024370.28613-100000@www.everquick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


AR> Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 16:17:16 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
AR> From: Alex Rubenstein


AR> Yes, ipfw/dummy is very very cool. Like, inducing a few 100
AR> msecs of latency to folks who don't pay on time :)

1. Oh, come on, I know you're more creative than _that_.  How
   about 30% packet loss on their *:53 TCP/UDP?  Or running them
   through stateful rules with uebershort timeouts?  Or simply
   having all their traffic trigger a scan (help! my firewall is
   seeing attacks to port 113!) right back at them.

2. I dub thee "Alex 'BOFH' Rubenstein".

;-)


--
Eddy

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com>
To: blacklist@brics.com
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to
be blocked.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post