[48200] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Discussion of Results
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard Forno)
Thu May 23 15:59:12 2002
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 15:58:48 -0400
From: Richard Forno <rforno@infowarrior.org>
To: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <nanog@adns.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Message-ID: <B912C238.31155%rforno@infowarrior.org>
In-Reply-To: <079001c2028e$0fc1dcd0$8101010a@TAKA>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Sounds like either way, the consensus was that ICANN has to go......which
isn't necessarily a bad thing. Very interesting.
rf
> From: "John Palmer (NANOG Acct)" <nanog@adns.net>
> Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:14:28 -0500
> To: <nanog@merit.edu>
> Subject: Discussion of Results
>
>
> Proposal #1 (which passed by over 2/3rds - 67.9%) expresses the sense of the
> GA that
> DOC should re-bid the ICANN contract and forget ICANN completely
>
> Proposal #2 (which passed by 75%) expresses to ICANN the desire that they
> reform in a meaningful way, and if they don't, that the DOC should replace
> ICANN.
>
> Interesting....
>
> ----
> AGN Domain Name Services, Inc http://www.adns.net
> Since 1995. The Registry for .AMERICA, .EARTH, .LION, .USA and .Z
> Define yourself or Be Defined.
> Censorship-free GA list at : http://dns-o.org/mailman/listinfo/ga
>
>
