[47959] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: PAIX (was Re: Interconnects)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ralph Doncaster)
Sun May 19 10:27:53 2002
Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 10:28:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph@istop.com>
To: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
Cc: "nanog@merit.edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20020519025432.GA12765@samurai.sfo.dead-dog.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0205191024470.16913-100000@cpu1693.adsl.bellglobal.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> traffic. If you're going to have to negotiate bilateral agreements to
> cover the bulk of your peering traffic, why not consistantly negotiate
> bilateral agreements?
Randy (Group Telecom) snubbed me when I asked to peer at TorIX. Group
Telecom is on the AADS MLPA. AT&T Canada has a tough policy re peering as
well, and is on the AADS MLPA. I'm sure there are others among the AADS
MLPA signatories that would refuse bilateral peering if I approached them.
-Ralph
