[47559] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Williams Opinions?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Granados)
Mon May 6 12:55:31 2002
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 09:52:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Scott Granados <scott@graphidelix.net>
To: "Owens, Shane (EPIK.ORL)" <sowens@epik.net>
Cc: "'nanog@nanog.org'" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <4FD9652327EA47409B17639A9BFEB936FA443A@orlmail02.feci.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205060951050.26376-100000@penguin.graphidelix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
My oppinion and its just my oppinionAAAAAA is that they aren't all that
good.:) They tend to route things oddly ie handing a customer a gig E
but the next op from the end router is an oc12 when there is an
uncongested oc48 available as well. They also seem to have a lot of
packet loss and routing strangeness.
just my .02
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Owens, Shane
(EPIK.ORL) wrote:
> Does anyone have any current opinions on Williams IP service and any
> expected changes with the Chapter 11?
>
> Shane
>
>
>
>
