[47488] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: anybody else been spammed by "no-ip.com" yet?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Forrest W. Christian)
Sat May 4 19:25:54 2002
Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 17:25:11 -0600 (MDT)
From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com>
To: "Eric A. Hall" <ehall@ehsco.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20020504171548.M56461-100000@workhorse.imach.com>
Message-ID: <20020504171942.U56461-100000@workhorse.imach.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I want to clarify this a bit, before I get flamed (not that I'm not going
to anyways).
On Sat, 4 May 2002, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
>
> The people in the middle would get *nothing* beyond what they are getting
> today.
>
> Grandma would get 2c for each mail she received. Grandma would pay 2c for
> each email she sent. Where does that cause the problems you are talking
> about?
What I am *specifically* talking about is a situation where people who
receive on average as many emails as they send don't pay ANYTHING above
what they are paying now.
We're trying to discourage bulk emailers, not individuals.
- Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Innovation Machine Ltd. P.O. Box 5749
http://www.imach.com/ Helena, MT 59604
Home of PacketFlux Technogies and BackupDNS.com (406)-442-6648
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Protect your personal freedoms - visit http://www.lp.org/
