[47387] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Large ISPs doing NAT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniska Tomas)
Fri May 3 05:12:02 2002
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 11:11:10 +0200
Message-ID: <A44DA7EDD8262343B02C64AF7E063A0726DDA4@kenya.ba.tronet.sk>
From: "Daniska Tomas" <tomas@tronet.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
do you think fufme (http://www.fu-fme.com/) would work well over nat? =
:))))
--
=20
Tomas Daniska
systems engineer
Tronet Computer Networks
Plynarenska 5, 829 75 Bratislava, Slovakia
tel: +421 2 58224111, fax: +421 2 58224199
=20
A transistor protected by a fast-acting fuse will protect the fuse by =
blowing first.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Francis [mailto:darkuncle@darkuncle.net]=20
> Sent: 3. m=E1ja 2002 9:13
> To: Dan Hollis
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 04:56:40PM -0700, goemon@anime.net=20
> said: [snip]
> > > I'm not buying a phone I can't run ssh from. End of story. My=20
> > > current phone
> > > does all that and more. Why step back into the dark ages=20
> of analog-type=20
> > > services?
> >=20
> > The average customer doesn't even know what telnet is, let=20
> alone ssh.=20
> > All they care about is browsing pr0n.
>=20
> Your phone can surf porn? Maybe the technology revolution has=20
> finally arrived after all ...
>=20
> > -Dan
> > --
> > [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
>=20
> --=20
> Scott Francis darkuncle@ [home:] d a r k u=20
> n c l e . n e t
> Systems/Network Manager sfrancis@ [work:] t=20
> o n o s . c o m
> GPG public key 0xCB33CCA7 illum oportet crescere=20
> me autem minui
>=20
