[47366] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: DDOS attacks and Large ISPs doing NAT?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mansey, Jon)
Thu May 2 14:37:38 2002

Message-ID: <43CAA8BAF8A21049B3ABF1A70AED597532EE90@laxexg01.la.interpacket.net>
From: "Mansey, Jon" <Jon_Mansey@verestar.com>
To: "'Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu'" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 11:32:48 -0700 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Unless Im mistaken (entirely possible), an IP enabled phone has 2 distinct
and separate "stacks", the IP stack and the "phone" stack.

As I said, in a NAT'd scenario the IP stack will never see an unsolicited
request and hence not respond to it.

The phone side of course will ring when called. Duh.

GPRS <> VoIP (yet)

Jm


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:26 AM
> To: Mansey, Jon
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: DDOS attacks and Large ISPs doing NAT? 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 02 May 2002 11:06:33 PDT, "Mansey, Jon" said:
> 
> > The DDOS discussion is specifically referring to a "live" syn or 
> > syn/ack attack from hosts that respond to connection 
> requests. A NAT'd 
> > cell phone wont, cant ever, respond to an unsolicited connection 
> > request.
> 
> *RING*!! *RING*!!  Oh, I'm sorry, that was the clue phone 
> ringing - it couldn't be your phone, since it wouldn't answer 
> an unsolicited connection request....
> 
> You were saying?
> 
> (To fill in the blanks - get a trojan loaded into the 
> cellphone/PDA combo, and then send it a page telling it 
> who/what to attack).
> 
> -- 
> 				Valdis Kletnieks
> 				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
> 				Virginia Tech
> 
> 

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post