[47315] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Global view increase (was:BGP route explosion)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marshall Eubanks)
Thu May 2 06:34:30 2002
From: "Marshall Eubanks" <tme@multicasttech.com>
To: James Spenceley <jrs@comindico.com.au>,
"'neil@DOMINO.ORG'" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>, andrew@whine.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 06:32:27 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1349973@multicasttech.com>
In-Reply-To: <C18A0DA32678884EABDE404B42FB08FC035A29@CORPEX.corporate>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 2 May 2002 19:59:52 +1000
James Spenceley <jrs@comindico.com.au> wrote:
>
> Around 15mins ago an additional ~5,000 routes entered the
> global view, sadly
> they appear to be hanging around.
This one I see.
These are coming from UUNET -at least as seen from here -
AS 705 added 4426 prefixes (from 609).
As there was not a corresponding increase in address space,
this is really more of a de-aggragation.
Same thing happened on Wed Apr 24 06:12:20, when
AS 701 added 2364 prefixes (from 2053). Again, it looked
like a de-aggragation.
If you look at Figure 1b of
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html
you can clearly see both jumps.
AS 705 has only one ASN in transit through it from here.
The recent change was all _inside_ AS 705.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> Last Tuesday had an increase of 2,000 routes.
>
> +7000 routes in a week is significant de-aggregation or
> leak, any ideas on
> where these routes are flowing ?
>
> I've not seen an increase on any of our peers, so I can
> only assume its
> coming from a network who doesn't peer particularly
> "openly".
>
> --
> James
