[47313] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jake Khuon)
Thu May 2 05:34:07 2002
Message-Id: <200205020933.g429XAPn014813@wooj.com>
From: "Jake Khuon" <khuon@NEEBU.Net>
To: "Daniska Tomas" <tomas@tronet.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: "Daniska Tomas"'s message of Thu, 02 May 2002 11:15:00 +0200.
<A44DA7EDD8262343B02C64AF7E063A07128459@kenya.ba.tronet.sk>
Reply-To: khuon@NEEBU.Net (Jake Khuon)
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 02:33:10 -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
### On Thu, 2 May 2002 11:15:00 +0200, "Daniska Tomas" <tomas@tronet.com>
### casually decided to expound upon <nanog@merit.edu> the following
### thoughts about "RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? ":
DT> you will end up with exactly two exactly specified services... not that
DT> bad, is it?
Nope... and that was my point. I was simply trying to address a statement
that might pidgeonhole the role of a 3G/GPRS device. I think we all should
know better than to assume something will never happen.
--
/*===================[ Jake Khuon <khuon@NEEBU.Net> ]======================+
| Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | --------------- |
| for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| N E T W O R K S |
+=========================================================================*/
