[47252] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Large ISPs doing NAT?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Wed May 1 17:03:09 2002
Reply-To: <deepak@ai.net>
From: "Deepak Jain" <deepak@ai.net>
To: "mike harrison" <meuon@highertech.net>, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: "kevin graham" <kgraham@dotnetdotcom.org>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 17:01:28 -0400
Message-ID: <GPEOJKGHAMKFIOMAGMDIOEPMLFAA.deepak@ai.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10205011058370.31950-100000@home.highertech.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Almost? I'd say it's hands down an EXCELLENT reason. In some configs
though, the NAT'd people can still see each other and cause problems,
but it still cuts down the exposure.
----
Presumably, the people it would cause problems for would be the customers of
someone getting paid to care about them. :)
Deepak Jain
AiNET
