[46883] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: references on non-central authority network protocols
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Hain)
Mon Apr 15 14:41:31 2002
From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
To: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk@cisco.com>,
"Scott A Crosby" <crosby@qwes.math.cmu.edu>
Cc: "Patrick Thomas" <root@utility.clubscholarship.com>,
<nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:40:23 -0700
Message-ID: <IEEOIFENFHDKFJFILDAHMECIEEAA.alh-ietf@tndh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <00c101c1e3f4$d05ebe80$e1876540@amer.cisco.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> Interesting idea though. Perhaps someone will write an i-d
> on autonomous
> numbering for IPv6.
RFC 3041 & http://www.tml.hut.fi/~pnr/publications/cam2001.pdf
Jasper Wallace wrote:
> Location - either distribute all the addresses evenly over
> the planet or try
> to map to population density.
>
> (the higher your density of sites, the more accurate your
> coordinates need
> to be).
>
> you could aggregate addresses by doing something like:
>
> 2 hemispheres
>
> 36 'triangular' chunks spaced every 10 degrees latitude.
>
> then split up in longditudernal stripes.
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-ipv6-pi-addr-02.txt
>
> but i think you'd be better allocation on the basis of
> population density.
>
> How exactly you'd make the social and economic changes to get
> to a system
> like this vs, the telcos/isps we have now is probably more
> trouble than it's
> worth ;-P
>
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hain-ipv6-pi-addr-use-02.txt
Tony
