[46814] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Load balancing in routers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Sprunk)
Thu Apr 11 15:30:11 2002
Message-ID: <020b01c1e18f$35f6e370$e1876540@amer.cisco.com>
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk@cisco.com>
To: "Peter Panagakos" <ppanagakos@nuvo.com>,
"joe mcguckin" <joe@via.net>,
"Iljitsch van Beijnum" <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:29:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Thus spake "Peter Panagakos" <ppanagakos@nuvo.com>
> Is this still the norm? In regards to not using "no ip route-cache".
>
> I recall reading somewhere in Cisco documentation that in BGP
> multihomed scenarios that it was the preferred method of control
> on non-CEF gear.
If that's still in the documentation, it's an oversight. Please see my
other message on the performance effects of process switching.
S
