[46567] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Re[2]: gtld-servers returning multiple A records for a NS?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Thu Apr 4 09:08:56 2002
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
Message-Id: <200204041328.NAA02077@vacation.karoshi.com>
To: william@elan.net
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:28:34 +0000 (UCT)
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204040432350.1547-100000@sokol.elan.net> from "william@elan.net" at Apr 04, 2002 04:46:11 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
yes, I'll get it updated. it might be worthwhile noting that there is
ipv6 support in rwhois. I know several registries have been working on
this topic for a while and folks ought to see the results of these efforts
in the next few months.
it is also true that the v6 root testbed has been around for about 3 years
and there is some hope that native v6 support will be added to the production
root system RSN.
>
>
> Somewhat on the topic but going into future instead of the past...
>
> I'm wondering if anyone started working on dns host registration system
> for ipv6 and whois support for this. It seems that currently all ipv6 dns
> comes from existing domains that are setup with ipv4 and there is no root
> ipv6 dns servers. Am I right? Are we planning to working on it anytime soon?
>
> And yes - I'v read http://www.isi.edu/~bmanning/v6DNS.html but it seems
> little out of date and does not mention A6 records. Bill, will you be
> updating the page?
>
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Allan Liska wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thursday, April 04, 2002, 3:26:18 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > wen> Worth is that about 4-6 months ago I started seeing multiple dns servers
> > wen> registered for the same ip address. Plus to that neither .biz nor .info
> > wen> dns servers are even showing on the internic root.
> >
> > Yea, apparently in January Verisign changed their long standing policy of
> > allowing only one name server to be registered per IP Address. To
> > confuse matters even more, I don't think all of the registrars support
> > this, and I have not seen anything official from ICANN (not that
> > anyone cares what ICANN thinks).
> >
> >
> > allan
> >
>
