|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 23:18:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Sabri Berisha <sabri@cluecentral.net> To: <jlewis@lewis.org> Cc: Andy Dills <andy@xecu.net>, <nanog@nanog.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204031539380.25520-100000@redhat1.mmaero.com> Message-ID: <20020403231754.U5586-100000@doos.cluecentral.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 jlewis@lewis.org wrote: > 10.0.0.0 - 10.255.255.255 (10/8 prefix) > 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255 (172.16/12 prefix) > 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255 (192.168/16 prefix) > > Someone has done an Apnic registration for rfc1918 private IP space. > What this has to do with solving spam problems is still a mystery to > me...unless someone is suggesting spammers (or perhaps all of Korea) > should be assigned non-routable IP space. My first thought when seeing that was "cool, no more trouble with open relays in .kr". -- Sabri Berisha "I route, therefore you are" ~ my own opinions etc ~ Join Megabit LAN in open air! http://www.megabit.nl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |