[46530] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Stealth p2p network in Kazaa and Morpheus?....
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anthony D Cennami)
Wed Apr 3 10:55:39 2002
Message-ID: <3CAB25D9.7030908@netscape.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:55:05 -0500
From: Anthony D Cennami <acennami@netscape.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CBoyd@apogeetelecom.com
Cc: "Nanog@Merit. Edu" <nanog@merit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
The utilization of your network is something that you should address in
your AUP. If your clients accepting the license agreement on their
network/peer-to-peer software interferes with the operation of your
facility or bandwidth then perhaps it's time to sit down at the drawing
board again.
You aren't maintaining anybodies distributed server farm. You're
maintaining the infrastructure that your clients pay you to use, and
they're allowing this application to function in the manner described in
plain english within the license agreement.
CBoyd@apogeetelecom.com wrote:
>
> <grouch>
> Maybe ISPs and carriers can file a class action suit against these guys for
> something. I wanted to run a network, not manage someone else's distributed
> server farm.
> </grouch>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Craig Holland [SMTP:cholland@yahoo-inc.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 6:35 PM
>>To: Nanog@Merit. Edu
>>Subject: Stealth p2p network in Kazaa and Morpheus?....
>>
>>
>>This was news to me, so I'm passing it along. Sorry if it's spam.
>>Checked
>>the archives, and didn't see anything to this affect.
>>
>><watch the wrap>
>>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/cn/20020402/tc_cn/stealth_p
>>2p
>>_network_hides_inside_kazaa
>>
