|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:50:51 -0500 (EST) From: batz <batsy@vapour.net> To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@opaltelecom.co.uk> Cc: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com>, "Mark E. Mallett" <mem@mv.mv.com>, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0203291202480.873-100000@staff.opaltelecom.net> Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203291140410.401-100000@vapour.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote: :Why should they talk to you? You're not a paying customer.. Because their network transits _most_ internet traffic and as a courtesy, they should provide some bare level of diagnostic services to the rest of the network. Maybe this has changed, but last I checked UUNet was practically ideologically opposed to providing a public looking glass inside 701 or 703. So many problems could be solved that way, IMHO. All providers that originate a certain percentage of all prefixes should be obligated to provide a public looking glass. This always made me really mad that the rest of the Internet had to rely on the charity of a few provders for basic diagnostic tools. However, this could very well have changed if there was a public lg in uunet. -- batz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |