|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 19:58:40 -0500 From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> To: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net> Cc: nanog@merit.edu Message-ID: <20020327005839.GV19704@overlord.e-gerbil.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020326192023.03f82c18@127.0.0.1> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:31:52PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > > >Are we talking AS_Path attributes here? If so, all this means > >is that now we don't announce OTHER BACKBONE routes to C&W/EXODUS, > >which we probably weren't doing anyway. > > Actually, it also mean a reduction in the possible paths presented to my > router for computation. Some would say this is a good thing. Me, I like > having multiple choices / redundancy. Better to have two ways to get to > EXDS than one. IMHO, of course. In my experience, the odds of any given path sucking are far greater than the odds of that path going away. Therefore I would rather have one path which doesn't suck than two paths which may. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |