[46313] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: PacBell Security/Abuse contact
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eric Whitehill)
Mon Mar 25 16:02:29 2002
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 15:57:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Eric Whitehill <eric@botbay.net>
To: "Cheung, Rick" <Rick.Cheung@NextelPartners.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5B2BB95CB505D5119D480002A534919501056430@mnmtkex3.nextelpartners.com>
Message-ID: <20020325154948.F12881-100000@botbay.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
UUNet, by far is the best. I've had mixed results with Sprint. A couple
of years ago I had to deal with Hurricane Electric and the tech was really good about
it - he added in the ACL I needed right over the phone.
Also, I know of a couple providers in the upper midwest that are pretty
good at working with DOS stuff. Email me off list if you are
interested.
-Eric
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Cheung, Rick wrote:
> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:12:02 -0600
> From: "Cheung, Rick" <Rick.Cheung@NextelPartners.com>
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: PacBell Security/Abuse contact
>
> Does anyone have an opinion on a decent ISP out there that's proven
> to work with the customer during a DDOS storm?
