[46288] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: SNMP and BGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Yu Ning)
Sun Mar 24 22:17:44 2002
From: "Yu Ning" <yuning@chinanet.cn.net>
To: "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.Nether.net>,
"Adam Spann" <spanna@au.psi.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:16:37 +0800
Message-ID: <NEBBLJLNILABAPLDMMPNCELAEBAA.yuning@chinanet.cn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020322021402.GB11664@puck.nether.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
|-----Original Message-----
|From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On
|Behalf Of Jared Mauch
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:14 AM
|To: Adam Spann
|Cc: 'nanog@merit.edu'
|Subject: Re: SNMP and BGP
|
|
|
| Please ask your vendors to implement the
|bgp mib v2 draft.. or at least the received routes info.
|(draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mibv2-02.txt)
|
| They already display it in their various CLIs. (juniper+cisco for
|example).
|
| They have the number available. it should be easy to reveal these
|in snmp for reliable accurate polling.
|
| - Jared
|
Hi,
I suppose there is vendor watching this thread. I also propose adding
current BGP table
version number into the BGP-MIB, because checking this number at regular
time will
give you an idea of your router bgp stability, without this MIB, I have to
use script to
parse router output (as mentioned in another post related to routing table
oscillation)
best,
Yu Ning
______________________________________
(Mr.) Yu Ning, Chief Engineer
ChinaNET (AS4134) Senior Support
Internet Dep. DCBU, China Telecom
Beijing, P.R.China +86-10-62072357
Personal Page-> http://navidog.126.com
______________________________________
