|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 07:17:55 -0500 (EST) From: Russ White <ruwhite@cisco.com> Reply-To: Russ White <riw@cisco.com> To: Jeff Workman <jworkman@pimpworks.org> Cc: "Sean M. Doran" <smd@clock.org>, ldiffey@technologyforward.com, nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <31210000.1016855085@mustang.rdu.pimpworks.org> Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0203230716410.2937-100000@ruwhite-u10.cisco.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu > > So cool, in fact, that I think that this bill is doomed because > > it does not go far enough to support exactly that sort of development. > > What I would like to know is, in the unlikely event that this > bill passed, how is it supposed to be implemented? > Particularly among the free software community, which most > likely wouldn't have the resources to implement this in the > timeline specified in this bill. Which should make us suspicious that MS is involved someplace, as well. Russ (not representing cisco, of course) __________________________________ riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |