[46053] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: PBNAPs renumbering 6-Mar-02 (was: more info on SBC/Nap)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Mon Mar 11 08:12:15 2002
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
Message-Id: <200203111343.NAA06626@vacation.karoshi.com>
To: aditya@grot.org
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 13:43:37 +0000 (UCT)
Cc: ren@internet.rockstar.org (renster), bmanning@karoshi.com,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20020310170139.GA73132@mighty.grot.org> from "Aditya" at Mar 10, 2002 09:01:40 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
i
I hope that the SBC folk will correct this soon.
>
> I assume the switch happened? In any case, there are no DNS servers listed for
> the in-addr records of these two blocks; is this by design?
>
> Adi
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:08:37PM -0500, renster wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Bill!
> >
> > Just one clarification - participants were told this would happen on
> > 6-March.
> >
> > From the note sent out to participants on Monday:
> > PBNAP-SF - 198.32.128.x will become: 206.223.120.x
> > PBNAP-LA - 198.32.129.x will become: 206.223.121.x
> >
> > If you are a participant and didn't get a copy of the note with dial-in
> > number for the maint. window drop me a line and I'll put you in touch with
> > the folks at the NAP.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -ren
> >
> > At 06:21 PM 2/14/2002 +0000, bmanning@karoshi.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > >I've just been told that SBC/PacBell is in process of renumbering
> > >the PacBell exchanges in Oakland and LA. So you should not see
> > >either 198.32.128.0 or 198.32.129.0 in your traceroutes or from
> > >your peers as of 28 feb 2002.
> > >
> > >--bill
> >
>
