[45857] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Tauzin-Dingell (was ICANN)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Lark)
Tue Feb 26 10:04:27 2002
Reply-To: <dlark@elmresources.com>
From: "Daniel Lark" <dlark@elmresources.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:03:52 -0700
Message-ID: <01c701c1bed6$cf2f31e0$0300000a@elmtestdom.elm>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-reply-to: <3C7BA19A.E9C8064A@greendragon.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Shouldn't the Tauzin/Dingell Bill really be renamed "2002 Death of the
CLEC Act"? This is just plain bad legislation anyway you cut it.
-dan
"The opinions are mine and not my employer's"
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
William Allen Simpson
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:55 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Tauzin-Dingell (was ICANN)
Although debating the latest personal diatribes about ICANN may be
entertaining, there's a closer threat on the horizon:
HR 1542 is up for vote tomorrow!
http://www.newnetworks.com/TauzinDingellisevil.htm
Have you called your representative(s)?
Have you asked your customers to call/email theirs?
--
William Allen Simpson
Key fingerprint = 17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26 DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
