[45406] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alexei Roudnev)
Fri Feb 1 01:35:18 2002
Message-ID: <016f01c1aae9$ff4e2da0$6401a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: "Alexei Roudnev" <alex@relcom.EU.net>
To: "Dan Hollis" <goemon@anime.net>,
"Marc Pierrat" <marc@sunchar.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Levy" <mahtin@mahtin.com>,
"Jon Mansey" <jon@interpacket.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 22:30:51 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Hmm, how can they prove it to _any_ court? They have not right to come in and look
around.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Hollis" <goemon@anime.net>
To: "Marc Pierrat" <marc@sunchar.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Levy" <mahtin@mahtin.com>; "Jon Mansey" <jon@interpacket.net>;
<nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Pierrat wrote:
> > It's not very enforceable, so I'd be very surprised to see much money
> > spent on this witch hunt.
>
> At least one provider has a fully staffed full time "anti-nat" divison
> now. But will they burn more cash in the nat witch-hunt than they save?
>
> I also wonder about false positives. Watch the lawsuits fly as they
> mistakenly cutoff non-nat customers.
>
> -Dan
> --
> [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
>
>
