[45399] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (JC Dill)
Thu Jan 31 22:57:06 2002
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020131195304.02d9ac58@127.0.0.1>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:53:09 -0800
To: Nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
From: JC Dill <nanog@vo.cnchost.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 02:18 PM 1/31/2002 -0500, Daniel Senie wrote:
>
>At 01:59 PM 1/31/02, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote:
>>
>> > It doesn't make sense that an ISP should complain that customers use
>> 100% of
>> > what they pay for.
>>
>>So you think that dialup users should be allowed to stay online 24/7 for
>>$20/month on an account advertised as unlimited?
>
>If not, then the use of the word "unlimited" is more than a bit misleading,
>no? Be careful what you market, as people (and the FTC) will be happy to
>hold you to your word.
So I take it that I get "unlimited" email storage disk space too? And I
can send or receive emails of any size?
No? Hmmm. I better get the FTC involved.
jc
jc
