[45366] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (EA Louie)
Thu Jan 31 17:16:01 2002
Message-ID: <00aa01c1aaa3$893dbb80$c9c8a8c0@san.rr.com>
From: "EA Louie" <elouie@yahoo.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:06:29 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Pierrat wrote:
> > It's not very enforceable, so I'd be very surprised to see much money
> > spent on this witch hunt.
>
> At least one provider has a fully staffed full time "anti-nat" divison
> now. But will they burn more cash in the nat witch-hunt than they save?
>
> I also wonder about false positives. Watch the lawsuits fly as they
> mistakenly cutoff non-nat customers.
>
assuming that they pull the plug prior to warning the accussed offender of
the problem. They'd get no false positive from me, that's for sure ;-)
Guilty as charged here.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
