[45360] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Bradford)
Thu Jan 31 16:50:25 2002
Message-ID: <3C59BC9C.EC0E559C@adelphia.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 16:52:28 -0500
From: Paul Bradford <pbradford@adelphia.net>
Reply-To: pbradford@adelphia.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Keith Woodworth <kwoody@citytel.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Keith Woodworth wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Dan Hollis wrote:
>
> |+On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Pierrat wrote:
> |+> It's not very enforceable, so I'd be very surprised to see much money
> |+> spent on this witch hunt.
> |+
> |+At least one provider has a fully staffed full time "anti-nat" divison
> |+now. But will they burn more cash in the nat witch-hunt than they save?
> |+
> |+I also wonder about false positives. Watch the lawsuits fly as they
> |+mistakenly cutoff non-nat customers.
>
> >From a technical standpoint how does one detect NAT users over the
> network?
Informants wherever Linksys router are sold.
>
> Keith
--
Paul A. Bradford pbradford@adelphia.net
