[45357] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Thu Jan 31 16:28:46 2002
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:27:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: Marc Pierrat <marc@sunchar.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Levy" <mahtin@mahtin.com>,
Jon Mansey <jon@interpacket.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CA21YZV54LGYX4XC7HXNJ2Z3W84UR.3c599361@office>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201311325000.27814-100000@sasami.anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Marc Pierrat wrote:
> It's not very enforceable, so I'd be very surprised to see much money
> spent on this witch hunt.
At least one provider has a fully staffed full time "anti-nat" divison
now. But will they burn more cash in the nat witch-hunt than they save?
I also wonder about false positives. Watch the lawsuits fly as they
mistakenly cutoff non-nat customers.
-Dan
--
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
