[45346] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Senie)
Thu Jan 31 14:27:41 2002
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020131141705.04017b30@mail.amaranth.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:18:09 -0500
To: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
From: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.41.0201311358140.28090-100000@amethyst.nstc.com
>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 01:59 PM 1/31/02, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
>On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote:
>
> > It doesn't make sense that an ISP should complain that customers use
> 100% of
> > what they pay for.
>
>So you think that dialup users should be allowed to stay online 24/7 for
>$20/month on an account advertised as unlimited?
If not, then the use of the word "unlimited" is more than a bit misleading,
no? Be careful what you market, as people (and the FTC) will be happy to
hold you to your word.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel Senie dts@senie.com
Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com
