[45344] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Pendergrass)
Thu Jan 31 14:19:30 2002
From: "Greg Pendergrass" <greg@band-x.com>
To: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
Cc: "Rowland, Alan D" <alan_r1@corp.earthlink.net>,
<nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:13:01 -0500
Message-ID: <NHEFLBCNBEKGPCFNBKHJOEBLDJAA.greg@band-x.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.41.0201311358140.28090-100000@amethyst.nstc.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Absolutely. If one goes to an all-you-can-eat buffet and has 4 plates of
food, can the restaurant complain to them? Of course not, unless they have a
definition of unlimited I don't know of. If you advertise unlimited access
to a customer then they can use it as much as they want to, by definition.
Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of
Steven J. Sobol
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:59 PM
To: Greg Pendergrass
Cc: Rowland, Alan D; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote:
> It doesn't make sense that an ISP should complain that customers use 100%
of
> what they pay for.
So you think that dialup users should be allowed to stay online 24/7 for
$20/month on an account advertised as unlimited?
--
JustThe.net LLC - Steve "Web Dude" Sobol, CTO ICQ: 56972932/WebDude216
website: http://JustThe.net email: sjsobol@JustThe.net phone: 216.619.2NET
postal: 5686 Davis Drive, Mentor On The Lake, OH 44060-2752 DalNet: ZX-2
