[45304] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick Evans)
Wed Jan 30 11:37:13 2002
Envelope-To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 16:23:21 +0000 (GMT)
From: Patrick Evans <pre@PRE.ORG>
To: James Smith <jsmith@PRESIDIO.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <171DAAD54475984F8F41345A0945DF9C39EDA2@hqexchange.presidio.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0201301622120.26459-100000@pimlico.pre.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, James Smith wrote:
> Maybe if we classed them by aggregate provisioned bandwidth, with
> a secondary classification that ranks number of peers at the
> point...
>
Hrm. Does that mean I can put a Black Diamond or M160 in a rack and
declare myself a Tier 0 NAP/IXP?
What a silly argument this is :)
--
Patrick Evans - teasing the gatso since 1993
free from the clutches of the law since 8/1/2002
pre@pre.org | www.pre.org | ZXR400L9 | Gibson SG
