[45301] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Schaefer)
Wed Jan 30 01:51:02 2002
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:50:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Steve Schaefer <schaefer@dashbit.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Alan Hannan <alan@routingloop.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <E16VoPn-000NcI-00@rip.psg.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0201292247480.407-100000@simone.dashbit.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > Something bothers me about this thread, and I think it is the
> > assertion that there is a proper definition for 'NAP' as
> > differentiated from 'IXP' or what not.
>
> yup. george santayana was right
>
You mean
"History is always written wrong, and so always needs to be rewritten."
or
"Intolerance is a form of egotism, and to condemn egotism intolerantly is
to share it."
or something else?
