[45286] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG 24: NAP BoF
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@karoshi.com)
Tue Jan 29 11:38:11 2002
From: bmanning@karoshi.com
Message-Id: <200201291706.RAA13474@vacation.karoshi.com>
To: rirving@onecall.net (Richard Irving)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:06:56 +0000 (UCT)
Cc: randy@psg.com (Randy Bush), mike@smashing.net (Mike Hughes),
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3C56CDFB.9EFDB647@onecall.net> from "Richard Irving" at Jan 29, 2002 11:29:47 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> Not!
>
> www.ep.net
>
>
> Randy Bush wrote:
> >
> > i believe there are/were only four NAPs, so scheduling should not be a
> > problem.
> >
> > randy
Richard,
Friend Bush has tounge firmly in cheek. He refers to the US NSF NAPs,
not the generic term Network Access Point, sometimes called Exchange
Point, or Internet eXchange.
I 'spect he is trolling.
--bill
