[45179] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: DNS DOS increasing?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James Smith)
Mon Jan 21 12:37:10 2002
Message-ID: <171DAAD54475984F8F41345A0945DF9C39ED4E@hqexchange.presidio.com>
From: James Smith <jsmith@PRESIDIO.com>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 12:36:43 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1A2A2.316DA81A"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1A2A2.316DA81A
Content-Type: text/plain
-----Original Message-----
From: E.B. Dreger [mailto:eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:08 PM
To: James Smith
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: DNS DOS increasing?
BGP isn't that expensive.
----
For some, it is a cost that can be mitigated by "workaround" technologies
that are cheaper.
Of course, it could be argued that if you're not willing to make the
investment to do it the BGP way, you don't really need it bad enough.
Enter the salesman who is heard to tell his prospects "...you don't have the
cost of BGP, you get the same effect as BGP, and you don't even have to tell
your ISP!".
James H. Smith II NNCDS NNCSE
Systems Engineer
The Presidio Corporation
By the way, I speak only for myself, which gets me in enough trouble...
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1A2A2.316DA81A
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2650.12">
<TITLE>RE: DNS DOS increasing?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-----Original Message-----</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>From: E.B. Dreger [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net">mailto:eddy+public+sp=
am@noc.everquick.net</A>]</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 12:08 PM</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>To: James Smith</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Cc: nanog@merit.edu</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Subject: RE: DNS DOS increasing?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>BGP isn't that expensive.</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>----</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>For some, it is a cost that can be mitigated by =
"workaround" technologies that are cheaper.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Of course, it could be argued that if you're not =
willing to make the investment to do it the BGP way, you don't really =
need it bad enough. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Enter the salesman who is heard to tell his prospects =
"...you don't have the cost of BGP, you get the same effect as =
BGP, and you don't even have to tell your ISP!".</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>James H. Smith II NNCDS NNCSE</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>Systems Engineer</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>The Presidio Corporation</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>By the way, I speak only for myself, which gets me in =
enough trouble...</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1A2A2.316DA81A--
