[45031] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Intelligent IGP Link Costing Algorithms?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bradley Dunn)
Fri Jan 11 03:27:42 2002

Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020111024113.037c8fb8@launch.server101.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 03:26:59 -0500
To: "Joel Krauska" <jkrauska@gte.net>
From: Bradley Dunn <bradley@dunn.org>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <002e01c19a63$c73ce0a0$6401a8c0@cool>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



>An added twist appears to be that a full demand matrix
>is difficult to build without large systems of flow
>collection. I'm curious if the problem can easily be
>approached without full insight in to this data.
>(per link usage yes, but without end-to-end flows)

Methods for reducing the number of flow collection points are discussed in 
this paper:
http://www.research.att.com/~jrex/papers/sigcomm00.pdf

Then there's always the MPLS as measurement platform approach. Set up a 
mesh of LSPs and you have edge-to-edge (or perhaps POP-to-POP to reduce the 
number of LSPs) traffic demands. Less ambitious variations on this can be 
used to classify limited amounts of traffic for tactical TE.

Something like Juniper's DCU might provide enough info, if 16 buckets is 
granular enough.

>I've seen a few modeling applications, but nothing that
>attempts to solve the general optimization problem.

There have been a couple of interesting papers on the topic recently. See, 
for example, work by Thorup et. al. and Ben-Ameur et. al. I'm not aware of 
released code that actually implements these papers, though.

Bradley


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post