[45025] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Adoption of MPLS in the Enterprise
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jesper Skriver)
Thu Jan 10 16:41:19 2002
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:40:18 +0100
From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>
To: Lee Watterworth <lwatterworth@rim.net>
Cc: "NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@nanog.org>
Message-ID: <20020110224018.I6320@skriver.dk>
Mail-Followup-To: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>,
Lee Watterworth <lwatterworth@rim.net>,
"NANOG (E-mail)" <nanog@nanog.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <BE61C6476F812B429389D76D730A11D1035A13@xch04ykf.rim.net>; from lwatterworth@rim.net on Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:40:02PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:40:02PM -0500, Lee Watterworth wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> MPLS has been in use at providers for a number of years.
>
> Does anyone have experience with MPLS adoption at the enterprise level? For
> what reasons was it deployed?
The same reasons service providers do it - offer multiple L3 networks on
the same physical infrastruture, also known as MPLS L3 VPN's
At least that's the deployments I've seen.
/Jesper
--
Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456
Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks)
Private: FreeBSD committer @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
