[44985] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Blocking Internet Gaming
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (sthaug@nethelp.no)
Mon Jan 7 08:46:57 2002
To: willys@clemson.edu
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:36:07 -0500 (EST)"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 14:45:16 +0100
Message-ID: <48738.1010411116@verdi.nethelp.no>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> We've had good luck here with the Packeteer packetshaper 6500.
>
> http://www.packeteer.com/products/packetshaper/index.cfm
>
> We use it mainly to control [not block] music download traffic.
Anybody tried nmap against a Packet Shaper recently? I tried it against
a box here which is no longer in service (not the 6500 model), and the
result isn't exactly reassuring.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Port State Service
21/tcp open ftp
23/tcp open telnet
80/tcp open http
137/tcp filtered netbios-ns
138/tcp filtered netbios-dgm
139/tcp filtered netbios-ssn
520/tcp filtered efs
1024/tcp open kdm
TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=64K rule
Difficulty=1 (Trivial joke)
Sequence numbers: 7E5BA800 7E5CA200 7E5E9600 7E5F9000 7E608A00 7E618400
Remote operating system guess: SunOS 4.0.3
