[44981] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Blocking Internet Gaming
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (achen-nanog@micropixel.com)
Sun Jan 6 23:24:10 2002
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:23:35 -0800 (PST)
From: <achen-nanog@micropixel.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20020107035952.GE15768@darkuncle.net>
Message-ID: <1010377416.tIDROKSV9dpHH7z1J2gJpWKvKznj1hOlQh2@micropixel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Scott Francis wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:54:13PM -0500, james@james-web.net said:
> [snip]
> > But if a brand new packet is outbound to 29760, you know it is probably
> > going to a Half Life server (I think that's the port). So wouldn't it
> > be wise to deny that? Specifically it would be UDP 29760, not TCP.
>
> TCP 27015/27016 by default
For Half-life, it's 27015/UDP, not TCP. Cheers.
-a
