[44789] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Peering Agreements
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vincent J. Bono)
Thu Dec 13 15:39:04 2001
Message-ID: <027501c18415$b4c69f60$98d1bece@VINNYARMADA>
From: "Vincent J. Bono" <vbono@vinny.org>
To: "Robert Tryce" <rtryce@deadnet.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>,
"renster" <ren@internet.rockstar.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 15:35:30 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Actually,
I think it is a waste of everyone elses time. The legal folks seem to enjoy
it though.
-vb
----- Original Message -----
From: "renster" <ren@internet.rockstar.org>
To: "Robert Tryce" <rtryce@deadnet.net>; <nanog@merit.edu>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: Peering Agreements
>
> Peering agreements for a public peering arrangement are a waste of legal
time.
>
> When there is a cost associated with termination of a circuit then it
makes
> more sense.
>
> Most peering agreements have the termination without cause clause
regardless.
>
> YMMV.
> -ren
>
> At 03:00 PM 12/13/2001 -0500, Robert Tryce wrote:
>
> >I have a question on public peering agreements. I have seen some
providers
> >using them while others are not. What is the general opinion on peering
> >agreements? Are most peering agreements used mainly for private peering?
> >Also, what are the pros and cons and what kind of protection should I
> >expect from such an agreement?
> >
> >
> >Thank you in advance,
> >
> >Robert Tryce
>
