[44779] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Cabling databases and wireless networks

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (batz)
Wed Dec 12 16:09:18 2001

Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 16:02:02 -0500 (EST)
From: batz <batsy@vapour.net>
To: Eric Gauthier <eric@roxanne.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20011212151859.A31717@roxanne.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0112121549460.75575-100000@vapour.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu



Though I do not have a specific solution for you, your Campus -> Building 
-> Floor -> Room hierarchiy will work for managing the actual equipment. 

If you want to deal with layer2 and up, (channel, segment, subnet) 
I would recommend listing Switch -> VLAN ->Port, and make it 
compatible with Router -> Subnet, and for the actual wireless segments, 
use GIS information, whereby you enumerate the wireless networks by
B/SSID (if they are wavelans), link that information with your switching
information, and then walk around with a laptop, wireless card, and 
a GPS and calculate the range of each access point, and put the 
results on a map using GRASS, or HUGO . 









On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Eric Gauthier wrote:

:Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 15:18:59 -0500
:From: Eric Gauthier <eric@roxanne.org>
:To: nanog@merit.edu
:Subject: Cabling databases and wireless networks
:
:
:Hello,
:
:The institution that I work for is rolling out wireless services on our
:campus which spans about a 10x10 block area.  We currently have a pretty 
:robust cable management database for tracking and relating our wired runs,
:switch ports, subnets, and physical rooms.  We're trying now to figure out 
:how to handle and document our wireless deployments with the same type
:of information and relationships.
:
:The problem that I see is that our database is structured around a 
:relationship hierarchy of Campus -> Building -> Floor -> Room, where each 
:item is a sub category of the one before it with no knowledge of adjacencies.  
:For example, the database might know that room 300 and room 301 are both on 
:the 3rd floor, but it doesn't understand if they are next to each other 
:nor if room 401 is above 301.  This seems like it will become more and
:more important since, with wireless gear, we're looking at coverage
:areas instead of lit wall outlets.
:
:Has anyone else tackled this yet or is there any good software out
:there to track this?
:
:Thanks
:
:Eric :)
:

-- 
--
batz
Reluctant Ninja
Defective Technologies


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post