[44769] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Hi

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Wed Dec 12 09:56:17 2001

From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org>
Cc: Larry Diffey <ldiffey@technologyforward.com>, nanog@merit.edu
Message-Id: <E16EAm8-0001VW-00@roam.psg.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 07:54:24 -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> I'm sure this is not what you meant, but I have noticed recently
> that many less-technically-inclined people seem to think that "the
> attachment" is the dangerous thing, almost as if the "technology of
> attachments" is somehow flawed and risky.

i think it is

   flawed - mime does not make things compatible, but rater codifies
   incompatibility.  the sender things that, because they can send it,
   the receiver can understand it.

   risky - as it allows encapsulation of executables, and the masses
   do not understand the concept, it opens up a channel to deeper in
   some recipients' systems than these naive users may be aware.  but
   like other tools, the misuse is not in the tool, but the mis-user.
   otoh, the user could be better warned, and the toolmaker could
   make the default installation safer for the recipient.

randy

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post