[44482] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: bgp geopolitical analysis (warning: zero operational
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Thu Nov 29 02:34:04 2001
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011129092845.00ff4260@max.att.net.il>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:33:05 +0200
To: k claffy <kc@ipn.caida.org>, nanog@nanog.org
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>
Cc: elfcore@caida.org
In-Reply-To: <20011127184555.B27371@caida.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 06:45 PM 11/27/2001 -0800, k claffy wrote:
Very nice. But:
1)
http://www.caida.org/analysis/geopolitical/bgp2country/data/source_add_pre_as.txt
ZA has the 3rd highest prefix count at 2700. Why does South Africa have
such a high prefix count?
2) 4th place is "??". Can you eloborate on that line?
Thanks,
Hank
>one of caida's elves (brad) did a cool
>visualization of demographic measures of
>Internet resources, stratified by continent with
>substratification by country (with help of
>CIA factbook, RouteViews, and NetGeo).
>
> http://www.caida.org/analysis/geopolitical/bgp2country/
>
> measures: geographic area, human population, GDP, phones-in-use,
> ASes, ISPs, prefixes, addresses....
>
>
>nothing overwhelmingly surprising here
>but compelling nonetheless
>(yes, it turns out data can be both)
>k
>
>
> //
> things are not what they seem to be,
> nor are they otherwise.
> -lankavatara sutra
> //
