[44478] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: MPLS in metro access networks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Wed Nov 28 20:18:08 2001
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:17:30 -0500
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: Dave Siegel <dsiegel@merit.edu>,
Daniel Golding <dgolding@sockeye.com>,
"Quibell, Marc" <mquibell@icn.state.ia.us>, mcohen@thrupoint.net
Message-ID: <20011128201730.A18374@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu,
Dave Siegel <dsiegel@trapdoor.merit.edu>,
Daniel Golding <dgolding@sockeye.com>,
"Quibell, Marc" <mquibell@icn.state.ia.us>, mcohen@thrupoint.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011128172715.C49634@siegelie.com>; from dave@siegelie.com on Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:27:15PM -0700
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:27:15PM -0700, Dave Siegel wrote:
> That being said, I would love to see some quantifiable data showing the
> differences in switching latencies between labels and packets. %age increase
If there is a difference in latency between MPLS and IP switching
you need to beat your vendor, and/or change vendors.
--
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
